The International court of justice: 75 years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38180/rpdi.v0i0.190Keywords:
CIJ, Corte Internacional de Justicia, 75° aniversarioAbstract
In accordance with its origins, the International Court of Justice has priorized continuity over change even in moments of intense systemic pressure. Over its 75 years of existence its problems and limitations linked to the realities of non compulsive and fragmented jurisdiction and misperceptions over its authority (it is not a World Court), the ICJ has sustained the principle of soveignty of states in order for them to access its services of conflict resolution even in times of increased transnational problems. Its effectiveness is linked to the quality not to quantity of its resolutions and the diversity of its composition in accordance with its status of principal judicial organ of the United Nations. The ICJ is an international regime with changing influence over time and the tribunal’s corporative cohesiveness.
References
Bustamante, J. (1964). La Corte Internacional de Justicia. Revista Derecho PUCP, 23, 6.
Cancado, A. (2003). Foundations of International Law: The Role and Importance of Its Basic Principles.
Comisión Relaciones Exteriores del Congreso. (1945). Dictamen emitido por la Comisión Relaciones Exteriores del Congreso. Revista Peruana de Derecho Internacional, (16 y 17).
Comisión de Relaciones Exteriores del Congreso. (s.f.). Dictamen emitido por la Comisión de Relaciones Exteriores del Congreso sobre la Declaración y Carta de las Naciones Unidas y Estatuto de la Corte Internacional de Justicia.
Cooley, A. & Nexon, D. (2020). How Hegemony Ends. Foreign Affairs.
Donohue, J. (2012). Dean’s Special Lecture, Lori Atheton. International Court of Justice
Donohue, J. (2014). Proceednigs of The Annual Meeting. American Society of International Law, 108, 114.
Donhue, J. (16 de abril de 2021). Reflections on the 75th Anniversary of the International Court of Justice. Naciones Unidad. https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/reflections-75th-anniversary-international-court-justice
Donohue, J. (2014). The Effectiveness of the International Court of Justice en Proceedings of the Annual Meeting. American Society of International Law, 108, 115.
Falk, R. (1984). The Role of the International Court of Justice. Journal of International Affairs, 37(2), 258.
International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/history
International Institute for Non Aligned Studies. (2017). https://iins.org/nam-reaffirms-the-importance-of-international-court-of-justice
Jiménez, E. (1973). The Ammendments to the Rules of Procedure of the International Court of Justice. The American Journal of International Law, 67(1), 1-22.
Lang, A. (2013). The Role of the International Court of Justice in a context of Fragmentation. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 62(4), 777-778.
Naciones Unidas. (27 de octubre de 2017). Asamblea General.
Naciones Unidas. (2006). Anuario de la Comisión de Derecho Internacional 2006.
Naciones Unidas. (1945). Carta de las Naciones Unidas, Artículo 95.
Naciones Unidas. (s.f.). Estatuto de la Corte Internacional de Justicia.
Naciones Unidas. (s.f.). La Conferencia de San Francisco. https://www.un.org/es/about-us/history-of-the-un/san-francisco-conference
Oellers-Frahm, K. (2001). Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdiction – Problems and Possible Solutions[Archivo PDF]. https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf1/mpunyb_oellers_frahm_5.pdf
Posner, E. & De Figueiredo, M. (2005). Is the International Court of Justice Biased?. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 599-630.
Presidencia del Buró de Coordinación del Movimiento No Alineado. (2 de noviembre de 2020).
Public Diplomacy. (2012). History and Evolution of the Non Alligned Movement. Government of India.
Resolución 44/23. (17 de noviembre de 1989). Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas.
Sellers, M. (2006). Republican Principles of International Law. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230505292
Sorensen, M. (1960). The International Court of Justice: It’s Role In Contemporary International Relations. International Organization, 4(2), 261.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Peruana de Derecho Internacional
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
