The Vienna convention on diplomatic relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38180/rpdi.v0i0.189Keywords:
Diplomatic missions / diplomatic agents / diplomatic bags / diplomatic correspondence / privileges and immunities / receiving State / sending State / inviolability of diplomatic premises / inviolability of diplomatic agentsAbstract
The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations adopted sixty years ago constitutes a unique example of international legislative success. The intensity of the processes of globalization and technological innovations, or the isolated cases of contempt by States, have not diminished its effectiveness as a fundamental instrument to promote international relations of peace and solidarity
References
Behrens, P. (2017). Diplomatic Law in a New Millennium. Oxford.
Behrens, P. (2017). Diplomatic Law Today. Has the Vienna Convention Met Its Expectations. En Behrens, P., ed. (2017). Diplomatic Law in a New Millennium. Oxford.
Black, J. (2010). A History of Diplomacy. Reaktion Books.
Brown, C. (2000). Book Review. Diplomatic Law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. American Journal of International Law, 94(2), 424-427.
Bruns, K. (2017). On the Road to Vienna. The Role of the International Law Commission in the Codification of Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities. En Behrens, P., ed. (2017). Diplomatic Law in a New Millennium. Oxford.
Colliard, C. (1961). La convention de Vienne sur les Relations Diplomatiques. Annuaire Francais de Droit International, 7, 3–42.
Cruz Yábar, M. M. (2017). La regulación jurídica de la valija diplomática en derecho internacional. Análisis de su inviolabilidad y el problema de su abuso. [Memoria para optar el grado de Doctor, Universidad Complutense].
Denza, E. (2010). Convención de Viena Sobre Relaciones Diplomáticas. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law.
Denza, E. (2016). Diplomatic Law. Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Oxford.
Grant, J. & Barker, J. (2009). Parry & Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law. Oxford University Press.
Liang, Y. (1953). Diplomatic Intercourse and Immunities as a Subject for Codification. The American Journal of International Law, 47(3), 439-448.
Naciones Unidas (1956). Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1949.
Naciones Unidas (1958). Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1958.
Novak, F. & Pardo, F. (2001). Derecho Diplomático: Comentario a la Convención sobre Relaciones Diplomáticas. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Panjabi, R. (1997). Terror at the Emperor's Birthday Party: An Analysis of the Hostage-Taking Incident at the Japanese Embassy in Lima, Peru. Dickinson Journal of International Law, 16(1), 1-148.
CBS News. (15 de octubre de 2018). Investigators inspect consulate in Turkey where Saudi writer disappeared https://www.cbsnews.com/news/missing-saudi-journalist-jamal-khashoggi-investigators-search-consulate-turkey-today-2018-10-15/
The New York Times. (01 de agosto de 1988). Thorny Issue: Peeking Into a Privileged Pouch. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/08/01/us/washington-talk-politics-diplomacy-thorny-issue-peeking-into-privileged-pouch.html
Young, E. (1964). The Development of the Law of Diplomatic Relations. British Year Book of International Law, 40, 141-182.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Oscar Schiappa-Pietra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.









