Private International Law and the judiciary

Authors

  • Robert G. MacLean U. University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38180/rpdi.v0i0.146

Keywords:

Conflict of Laws, Constitution, Civil Code, Code of Criminal Law, Prejudice, prevarication, doble identity, Tolerance

Abstract

How a Court of Law and a State entity by prejudices rushed into ignoring peruvian rules of Private International Law and committed the crime of prevarication. 

Author Biography

  • Robert G. MacLean U., University of Cambridge

    Miembro Titular de la Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Internacional. Estudios Univ. de San Marcos) y Univ. de Cambridge,U.K. (1954-1957); Docencia: U.N.M.S.M y P.U.C.; Univ. de Leeds, U.K: Academia de Derecho Int. de La Haya (1989); Georgetown Univ. EEUU; Presidente del Comité Jurídico Interamericano.

References

B. de Maekelt, T. (2005). Teoría General del Derecho Internacional Privado.

Lorenz, K. (1973). Motivation of Human and Animal Behaviour.

Mlodinow, L. (2013). Subliminal: How your unconscious mind rules your behavior. Pantheon/Random House.

Hallinan, J. (2014). Hidding Ourselves:The Hidden Power of Self Deception.

Chabris, C. (2009). The Invisible Gorila and Other Ways Our Intuition Deceive Us.

Additional Files

Published

2020-11-17

Issue

No. 166 (2020): Tomo LXX Septiembre - Diciembre 2020 No. 166, Revista Peruana de Derecho Internacional

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Roberto G. MacLean U.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Private International Law and the judiciary. (2020). Revista Peruana de Derecho Internacional, 70(166), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.38180/rpdi.v0i0.146