The Montreal Protocol: an international law achievement
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38180/rpdi.v75i180.595Mots-clés :
Environmental Law, Montreal Protocol , International Law, Flexibility , Precautionary Principle , Common but Differentiated Responsibilities, Soft LawRésumé
The current state of the environment is a major concern for most of the countries. However, despite all the efforts made in the multilateral arena, it seems that the practical results are minimal. Within this context, the Montreal Protocol remains as an international instrument that has been implemented successfully worldwide. This article explores the legal characteristics that made the Montreal Protocol such a remarkable legal agreement, proposing that it involves a series of well-designed binding commitments, a precautionary approach, makes differentiation for developing countries, is a flexible agreement, does not include soft law, and reflects a sense of compromise among the international community, all of which has led it to its unquestionable success. For those purposes, the articles use an international law perspective mainly from the Critical Legal Studies approach and from Law and Economics.
Références
Andersen, Stephen O, Song Gao, Suely Carvalho, Tad Ferris, Marco Gonzalez, Nancy J Sherman, Yiyao Wei, and Durwood Zaelke. 2021. “Narrowing Feedstock Exemptions Under the Montreal Protocol Has Multiple Environmental Benefits.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 118 (49): 1. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022668118.
Atapattu, Sumudu A. 2006. Emerging Principles of International Environmental Law. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.
Barnes, Paul W., Janet F. Bornman, Krishna K. Pandey, Germar H. Bernhard, Alkiviadis F. Bais, Rachel E. Neale, Thomas Matthew Robson, et al. 2021. “The success of the Montreal Protocol in Mitigating Interactive Effects of Stratospheric Ozone Depletion and Climate Change on the Environment.” Global Change Biology 27 (22): 5681–83.
Barrett, Scott. 1990. “The Problem of Global Environmental Protection”. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 6 (1): 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/6.1.68.
Barrett, Scott. 2008. “Climate Treaties and the Imperative of Enforcement.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24 (2): 239–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn015.
Benedick, Richard E. 2008. “Science Inspiring Diplomacy: The Improbable Montreal Protocol.” In Twenty Years of Ozone Decline, 13–19. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2469-5_4.
Bodansky, Daniel. 2012. “What's in a Concept? Global Public Goods, International Law, and Legitimacy.” European Journal of International Law 23 (3): 651–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs035.
Boyle, Alan. E. 1999. “Some Reflections on the Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48 (4): 901–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300063739
Canan, Penelope, Stephen O Andersen, Nancy Reichman, and Brian Gareau. 2015. “Introduction to the Special Issue on Ozone Layer Protection and Climate Change: The Extraordinary Experience of Building the Montreal Protocol, Lessons Learned, and Hopes for Future Climate Change Efforts.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5 (2): 111–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0224-1.
Cardesa-Salzmann, Antonio. 2012. “Constitutionalizing Secondary Rules in Global Environmental Regimes.” Journal of Environmental Law 24 (1): 103–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqr022.
Chinkin, C. M. 1989. “The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38 (4): 850–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/38.4.850.
DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2001. “The Experience of the Montreal Protocol: Particularly Remarkable, and Remarkably Particular.” UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 19 (1): 49.
Ebbesson, Jonas. 2010. “The Rule of Law in Governance of Complex Socio-Ecological Changes.” Global Environmental Change 20 (3): 414–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.009.
Ellis, Jaye. 2012. “Shades of Grey: Soft Law and the Validity of Public International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 25 (2): 313–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156512000052.
Elspeth Faiman Hans, "The Montreal Protocol in U.S. Domestic Law: A Bottom-up Approach to the Development of Global Administrative Law," New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 45, no. 3 (Spring 2013): 827-860 .
Epstein, Graham, Irene Perez, Michael Schoon, and Chanda L. Meek. 2014. “Governing the Invisible Commons: Ozone Regulation and the Montreal Protocol.” International Journal of the Commons 8 (2): 337–60. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.407.
Ezeizabarrena, Xabier. 2020. «Derecho Medioambiental Internacional Y La Nueva soberanía: Algunos Retos Pendientes». Estudios De Deusto 68 (1), 155-62. https://doi.org/10.18543/ed-68(1)-2020pp155-162.
Feng, Wuhu, Sandip S. Dhomse, Carlo Arosio, Mark Weber, John P. Burrows, Michelle L. Santee, and Martyn P. Chipperfield. 2021. “Arctic Ozone Depletion in 2019/20: Roles of Chemistry, Dynamics and the Montreal Protocol.” Geophysical Research Letters 48 (4): n/a–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091911.
Finkelman, Andrew D. "The Post-Ratification Consensus Agreements of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol: Law or Politics - An Analysis of Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA," Iowa Law Review 93, no. 2 (February 2008): 665-730.
Gareau, Brian J. 2008. “Dangerous Holes in Global Environmental Governance: The Roles of Neoliberal Discourse, Science, and California Agriculture in the Montreal Protocol.” Antipode 40 (1): 102–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00572.x.
Gareau, Brian J. 2015. “Lessons from the Montreal Protocol Delay in Phasing Out Methyl Bromide.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5 (2): 163–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0212-x.
Garzone, Giuliana. 2013. “Variation in the Use of Modality in Legislative Texts: Focus on Shall.” Journal of Pragmatics 57 (Oct): 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.008.
Green, Bryan A. 2009. “Lessons from the Montreal Protocol: Guidance for the Next International Climate Change Agreement”. Environmental Law (Portland, Ore.) 39 (1): 253–83.
Godin-Beekmann, Sophie, Paul A Newman, and Irina Petropavlovskikh. 2018. “30th Anniversary of the Montreal Protocol: From the Safeguard of the Ozone Layer to the Protection of the Earth's Climate.” Comptes Rendus Géoscience 350 (7): 331–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2018.11.001.
Goldmann, Matthias. 2012. “Soft Law and Other Forms of International Public Authority – The View from Discourse Theory: A Reply to Jaye Ellis.” Leiden Journal of International Law 25 (2): 373–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156512000088.
Gonzalez, Marco, Kristen N Taddonio, and Nancy J Sherman. 2015. “The Montreal Protocol: How Today’s Successes Offer a Pathway to the Future.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5 (2): 122–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0208-6.
Goyal, Rishav, Matthew H England, Alex Sen Gupta, and Martin Jucker. 2019. “Reduction in Surface Climate Change Achieved by the 1987 Montreal Protocol.” Environmental Research Letters 14 (12): 124041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4874.
Held, David, and Charles Roger. 2018. “Three Models of Global Climate Governance: From Kyoto to Paris and Beyond.” Global Policy 9 (4): 527–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12617.
Hey, Ellen, and S Anesen. 2005. “The Effectiveness and Legitimacy of International Environmental Institutions.” International Environmental Agreements?: Politics, Law and Economics 5 (3): 211–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-3804-9.
Hossaini, R., M. P. Chipperfield, A. Saiz-Lopez, J. J. Harrison, R. von Glasow, R. Sommariva, E. Atlas, et al. 2015. “Growth in Stratospheric Chlorine from Short-Lived Chemicals Not Controlled by the Montreal Protocol.” Geophysical Research Letters 42 (11): 4573–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063783.
Jacobs, J. Roger. 2014. “The Precautionary Principle as a Provisional Instrument in Environmental Policy: The Montreal Protocol Case Study.” Environmental Science & Policy 37: 161–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.007.
Kelleher, David S. 2001. “Public Economics and International Enviromental Policy: The Case of Ozone Layer Preservayion.” International Review of Public Administration 6 (2).
Koskenniemi, Martti. “What Are the Different Faces of International Law?” YouTube, YouTube, 9 Apr. 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ9n8Pw_FEY. Accessed 16 July 2022.
Koskenniemi, Martti “Rules and Standards in International Law.” YouTube, YouTube, 9 Apr. 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQuvZ31WW70. Accessed 16 July 2022.
Karlsson, Mikael. 2006. “The Precautionary Principle, Swedish Chemicals Policy and Sustainable Development.” Journal of Risk Research 9 (4): 337–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870600717269.
Klabbers, Jan. 1999. “The Redundancy of Soft Law.” Nordic Journal of International Law = Acta Scandinavica Juris Gentium 65 (2): 167–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718109620294889.
Krapivkina, Olga A. 2017. “Semantics of the Verb Shall in Legal Discourse.” Jezikoslovlje 18 (2): 305.
Maeder, J. A., J. Staehelin, T. Peter, D. Brunner, H. E. Rieder, and W. A. Stahel. 2010. “Evidence for the Effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol to Protect the Ozone Layer.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10 (24): 12161–71. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12161-2010.
McKenzie, Richard, Germar Bernhard, Ben Liley, Patrick Disterhoft, Steve Rhodes, Alkiviadis Bais, Olaf Morgenstern, et al. 2019. “Success of Montreal Protocol Demonstrated by Comparing High-Quality UV Measurements with “World Avoided” Calculations from Two Chemistry-Climate Models.” Scientific Reports 9 (1): 12332–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48625-z.
Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. 16 September 1987 (entered into force on 1 January 1989)
Morgenstern, Olaf, Peter Braesicke, Margaret M. Hurwitz, Fiona M. O'Connor, Andrew C. Bushell, Colin E. Johnson, and John A. Pyle. 2008. “The World Avoided by the Montreal Protocol.” Geophysical Research Letters 35 (16): L16811–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034590.
Newman, Paul A, and Richard McKenzie. 2020. “UV Impacts Avoided by the Montreal Protocol.” Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 10 (7): 1152–60. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0pp00387e.
Norman, Catherine, Stephen DeCanio, and Lin Fan. 2008. “The Montreal Protocol at 20: Ongoing Opportunities for Integration with Climate Protection.” Global Environmental Change 18 (2): 330–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.003.
O'Riordan, Tim, and Andrew Jordan. 1996. “Institution for Global Environmental Change.” Global Environmental Change 6 (4): 395–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(97)88960-1.
Plein, A. 2007. A story between success and challenge?: 20th anniversary of the Montreal Protocol. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law, 11(11), 67–98.
Pergantis, Vassilis. 2009. “Soft Law, diplomatic assurances and the instrumentalization of normativity: wither a liberal promise” Netherlands International Law Review 56 (2): 137–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X09001375
Rajamani, Lavanya. 2016. “The 2015 Paris Agreement.” Journal of Environmental Law 28 (2): 337–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw015.
Raitio, Juha. "Legal Certainty as an Element of Objectivity in Law." In Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning, edited by Jaakko Husa and Mark Van Hoecke, 85–108. London: Hart Publishing, 2013. Accessed July 13, 2022. http://dx.doi.org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.5040/9781472566331.ch-005.
Robertson, Margaret. 2021. Sustainability Principles and Practice. Third edition. Milton: Taylor & Francis Group.
Roshchin, Evgeny. 2017. “The Hague Conferences and ‘international Community’: a Politics of Conceptual Innovation.” Review of International Studies 43 (1): 177–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210516000267.
Skjærseth, Jon Birger, Olav Schram Stokke, and Jørgen Wettestad. 2006. “Soft Law, Hard Law, and Effective Implementation of International Environmental Norms.” Global Environmental Politics 6 (3): 104–20. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.3.104.
Simma, Bruno, and Dirk Pulkowski. 2006. “Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law.” European Journal of International Law 17 (3): 483–529. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl015.
Sunstein, Cass Robert. 2006. “Montreal Versus Kyoto: A Tale of Two Protocols.” Available: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1323&context=law_and_economics. Accessed 16 July 2022.
Thoms, L. 2003. “A Comparative Analysis of International Regimes on Ozone and Climate Change with Implications for Regime Design.” The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 41 (3): 795–859.
United Nations Environment Programme. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. 7/17/22.
https://ozone.unep.org/treaties/montreal-protocol/articles/annex-controlled-substances?q=es/treaties/el-protocol-de-montreal/articles/anexo-sustancias-controladas Accessed 17 July 2022.
Vu, Hong Tien, Matthew Blomberg, Hyunjin Seo, Yuchen Liu, Fatemeh Shayesteh, and Hung Viet Do. 2021. “Social Media and Environmental Activism: Framing Climate Change on Facebook by Global NGOs.” Science Communication 43 (1): 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971644.
Young, Paul J., Anna B. Harper, Chris Huntingford, Nigel D. Paul, Olaf Morgenstern, Paul A. Newman, Luke D. Oman, Sasha Madronich, and Rolando R. Garcia. 2021. “The Montreal Protocol Protects the Terrestrial Carbon Sink.” Nature (London) 596 (7872): 384–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03737-3.
Willi, Kathryn, A. R Ravishankara, Guus J. M Velders, John S Daniel, Mack McFarland, and Stephen O Andersen. 2021. “The Precautionary Principle and the Environment: A Case Study of an Immediate Global Response to the Molina and Rowland Warning.” ACS Earth and Space Chemistry 5 (11): 3036–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00244.
Wu, Yutian, Lorenzo M. Polvani, and Richard Seager. 2013. “The Importance of the Montreal Protocol in Protecting Earth’s Hydroclimate.” Journal of Climate 26 (12): 4049–68. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00675.1.
Zaelke, Durwood, Stephen O. Andersen, and Nathan Borgford-Parnell. 2012. “Strengthening Ambition for Climate Mitigation: The Role of the Montreal Protocol in Reducing Short-Lived Climate Pollutants.” Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 21 (3): 231–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12010.
Zeng, Ling-liang. 2014. “The Status and Application of Good Faith in International Law.” Xian dai fa xue 36 (4): 146–53. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2014.04.13.
Zerefos, Christos., G. Contopoulos, Gregory. Skalkeas, and Symposium for the 20th Anniversary of the Montreal Protocol. 2009. Twenty Years of Ozone Decline?:Proceedings of the Symposium for the 20th Anniversary of the Montreal Protocol. 1st ed. 2009. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands?: Imprint: Springer.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright José Alonso Yépez Castro 2025

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.









